Which contract concept involves an agreement to substitute performance and its completion to settle a dispute?

Study for the Chartered Property Casualty Underwriter 530 Exam with flashcards and multiple choice questions. Each question has hints and explanations to enhance your understanding and prepare you thoroughly.

Multiple Choice

Which contract concept involves an agreement to substitute performance and its completion to settle a dispute?

Explanation:
Accord and satisfaction involves a dispute over what is owed, and the parties agree to substitute a different performance for the original obligation to settle that dispute. The accord is the agreement to accept this substitute, and the satisfaction is the actual completion of that substituted performance. Once the substituted performance is completed, the original obligation is discharged. This concept is used when the claim is unliquidated or disputed, such as agreeing to accept a lesser amount or a different form of payment as full settlement. If the substituted performance isn’t carried out, the original obligation can still remain enforceable. The other choices don’t fit because: a gratuitous promise lacks the consideration needed to form a binding contract; an exculpatory clause shifts liability rather than substituting one performance for another to settle a dispute; valuable consideration refers to what is exchanged to form a contract, not the mechanism of settling a dispute by substituting performance.

Accord and satisfaction involves a dispute over what is owed, and the parties agree to substitute a different performance for the original obligation to settle that dispute. The accord is the agreement to accept this substitute, and the satisfaction is the actual completion of that substituted performance. Once the substituted performance is completed, the original obligation is discharged.

This concept is used when the claim is unliquidated or disputed, such as agreeing to accept a lesser amount or a different form of payment as full settlement. If the substituted performance isn’t carried out, the original obligation can still remain enforceable.

The other choices don’t fit because: a gratuitous promise lacks the consideration needed to form a binding contract; an exculpatory clause shifts liability rather than substituting one performance for another to settle a dispute; valuable consideration refers to what is exchanged to form a contract, not the mechanism of settling a dispute by substituting performance.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy